Coordination in Minimalist Grammars: Excorporation and Across the Board (Head) Movement
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper describes how coordination has been integrated into a broad coverage statistical Minimalist Grammar parser currently under development, and presents a unified analysis for a number of coordinate (and related) constructions sometimes considered problematic for transfor-mational syntax; these include across-the-board (ATB) head and phrasal movements, argument cluster coordination, right node raising and parasitic gaps. To accommodate all these structures, a number of novel extensions are introduced into the formalism, including a mechanism for excorporation which enables ATB head movement; this supplements a variant of Kobele's (2008) mechanism for ATB phrasal movement. The weak expressive power of the formalism is shown to be unaffected by these extensions.
منابع مشابه
Across-the-Board Extraction in Minimalist Grammars
Minimalist grammars cannot provide adequate descriptions of constructions in which a single filler saturates two mutually independent gaps, as is commonly analyzed to be the case in parasitic gap constructions and other across-the-board extraction phenomena. In this paper, I show how a simple addition to the minimalist grammar formalism allows for a unified treatment of control and parasitic ga...
متن کاملFormalizing Mirror Theory
In his account of the mirror principle, Baker (1988) relies crucially on head (X) movement, to which he (compellingly) argues that the GF changing processes can be reduced. This move, along with the head movement constraint (Travis, 1984), allow Baker to account for the mirror principle. Head movement however, seems to have very different properties from phrasal (XP) movement. For example, head...
متن کاملA Note on Countercyclicity and Minimalist Grammars
Minimalist grammars (MGs), as introduced in Stabler (1997), have proven a useful instrument in the formal analysis of syntactic theories developed within the minimalist branch of the principles–and–parameters framework (cf. Chomsky 1995, 2000). In fact, as shown in Michaelis (2001), MGs belong to the class of mildly context–sensitive grammars. Interestingly, without there being a rise in (at le...
متن کاملGrammar Size and Quantitative Restrictions on Movement
Recently is has been proved that every Minimalist grammar can be converted into a strongly equivalent single movement normal form such that every phrase moves at most once in every derivation. The normal form conversion greatly simplifies the formalism and reduces the complexity of movement dependencies, but it also runs the risk of greatly increasing the size of the grammar. I show that no suc...
متن کاملCategorial Minimalist Grammar
1. Convergence at first sight, and differences in a second time From the early days of the minimalist program of Chomsky (1993), a convergence with categorial grammars was noticed by Ep-stein and Berwick (1995). The striking similarity lies in the merge operation, which looks like the application rule of the AB grammars. In both cases, word order is a consequence of the consumption rules but in...
متن کامل